Friday, May 16, 2008

LOL

The lax rules of e-mail communication — is it negative because it further degrades the language, or is it positive because it encourages more written communication? Do the many IM acronyms enhance or harm written English?

I know a Pulitzer Prize winner who doesn't bother with capitalization or punctuation in his e-mail correspondence, nor does he take time to correct his typos. Can we, should we, relax a bit when writing online?

What is the impact of this new medium on the English language?

And back to our prior discussion:
My sculpture professor in college took up cello late in life (with late defined as "in his 40s") and performed in the local orchestra. He said it made him a better artist. What did he mean?

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

I think that internet acronyms are helpful for those who don't have time to spell out every detail of a word. It is great in a way that it's getting more people to participate in written comunications. However, some let it interfere with PROPER written comunications! Great post and nice title. I LOLed!
~Justin Shoulta~